Comparison
OutreachFrog vs LinkGap
Link building services with an emphasis on competitor gap analysis. Here is how the two actually differ — including where LinkGap is the better choice.
| How each one works | OutreachFrog | LinkGap |
|---|---|---|
| Buy without a sales callOrder from a catalogue yourself | Yes | Varies |
| Managed campaignA person picks targets for your site | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing publishedCosts visible before you enquire | Yes | Varies |
| White labelResold under an agency's own brand | Yes | Varies |
Service model only — we do not list LinkGap's prices or performance here, because those change without notice and a stale number helps nobody. Last reviewed 2026-08-25. If anything is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.
What LinkGap does well
- Gap analysis as the starting point, which is the right instinct
- Campaigns shaped around competitive position
- Analytical rather than catalogue-driven
Where we are different
We start from the same instinct. The comparison worth making is depth of reporting and what happens after the gap is closed.
When LinkGap is the better choice
Their analysis lands closer to your market than ours. Worth putting both gap reports side by side.
We would rather say so here than take on work we are the wrong fit for.
See the gap before you commit
We will show you which links your competitors have that you do not, and what closing that gap would take. No obligation either way.
Compare other agencies
OutreachFrog vs FatJoe
One of the longest-running white-label resellers, built for agencies ordering at volume.
OutreachFrog vs The HOTH
A large self-serve SEO marketplace with productised packages across links, content and local SEO.
OutreachFrog vs uSERP
A high-end managed link building and digital PR agency aimed at funded startups and enterprise.
OutreachFrog vs Page One Power
A US managed link building agency running custom campaigns, quoted per engagement.